Adsense

YB

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Kobe Never Won Without (Big) Help

After Kobe Bryant received his fifth ring a few years back, speculation about whether he could pass Michael Jordan on the hardwood and in the history books began to swirl.  After all, he is only one ring shy of Michael’s impressive six, and statistically no one has been able to produce the way Bryant has since MJ hung it up.  Throw in the killer instinct and that alpha-dog drive possessed by both and it becomes easy to see where the comparisons come in to play. 

Like most kids who grew up in the late 80’s and early 90’s, Kobe idolized MJ, and developed a good part of his own game by emulating Michael’s moves.  The difference between Kobe and most kids, however, was when Kobe imitated MJ on the hardwood, he actually did it well.  So well in fact, that entering the sixteenth season of his illustrious NBA career, many call Kobe the second coming of Michael. 

While Kobe, one of the most talented, driven, and dedicated players of all time is deserving of all the accolades and acclaim he receives on the court,  I feel that the comparison to the greatest of all time is a little unfounded.  This is not necessarily a knock on Kobe, as it is doubtful that anyone will be able to duplicate the individual success Michael achieved on the hardwood.  In fact, Kobe may have come as close as possible, causing many to aptly label him “this generation’s Jordan.”

However, despite all Kobe’s success and similarities to MJ, there is one obvious, yet important distinction between the two; Kobe never won without big help, literally.  In other words, Kobe Bryant never won an NBA Title without the presence of a premier post player on his team. 

Although it is now slowly shifting to a small-ball, semi-Euro style of play, the NBA has long been a big man’s game, in which having a superior center on your team was a good indicator of success, and Kobe Bryant has benefitted from this blue print as much as anyone.

As everyone is well aware, Kobe’s first three titles came while playing alongside Shaquille O’Neil, one of the most talented and dominant big men the game has ever seen.  It was Shaq, not Kobe, who was named MVP in all three of those Finals appearances while averaging an incredible 29.8 points and 14.4 rebounds per game over the course of those three playoff appearances.  While Kobe was no slouch statistically during those runs, he was clearly second fiddle to Shaq; a role Jordan never knew.  The best statistical support MJ ever received from a big guy during a Finals run was the 13.3 points and 8.1 rebounds per game Horace Grant put up in the 1990-1991 playoffs. 

Although he was clearly the go-to-guy on his next two title teams, Kobe’s fourth and fifth rings didn’t come without their fair share of help.  In fact, if you can recall the first couple seasons in L.A. post-Shaq, Kobe struggled to keep the Lakers afloat, while complaining that he needed help (Also something you never heard Jordan do).  Luckily for Kobe, the Lakers front office has long been able to work miracles, and help came in the form of Pau Gasol, another one of the League’s premier post players. 

With Pau in the post, and the help of young stud center Andrew Bynum, Kobe was able to take home two more titles, while finally etching his name on the Finals MVP trophy; an honor Shaq’s performances had prevented him from.  During those 08-09, and 09-10 playoffs, when the Lakers won their two most recent titles, Pau averaged an impressive 18.9 point and 10.95 rebounds per game; again well above any big man help Michael benefitted from.  In other words, even when Kobe’s titles weren’t being driven by The Diesel’s dominance, he still had supreme (nearly 20-10) frontcourt support. 

Sure Michael had Scottie, but the benefits of having a dominant big on the block often outweighs that of another wing, as bigs can draw attention (and defenders) away from the other players on the floor.


Kobe is one of the most driven and dedicated players of all time. He was an integral part of five (so far) championship teams and has put up some individual statistics at a consistency the likes of which the League has never seen. He is a first ballot hall of famer and one of the game's all time greats. However, when it comes to comparing him to THE all time great, his surrounding cast in those championship seasons must be considered.  Kobe's frontcourt support (3 titles with shaq, 2 with pau) is far superior to MJ's (a combination of King, Cartwright, Horace Grant, Rodman and Luc Longley; none of which averaged more then 12 ppg during the playoffs of any of Michael's championship seasons).

So, while Kobe may be this generation’s Jordan, it is important not to forget the frontcourt help he had along the way; a luxury the original MJ never enjoyed.

 

--

All statistics @ Basketball-Reference.com

9 comments:

  1. Playing devils advocate: shaqs first three are non existent with our Kobe. Playoff ppg: 2000 - 21.1, 2001 - 29.4, 2002 - 26.6. Shaqs three finals MVPs were against Rik Smits (in his last year), mutombo (age 34...probably really 44), and Todd MacCulloch (enough said). He better have won finals MVP those years...as far as Kobe's supporting cast in his two recent titles, ill take Pippen, Rodman, and Kukoc over Gasol, young Andrew Bynum, Lamar Odom any day.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was very poorly written. Obviously very biased and one sided.

    ReplyDelete
  3. True, Shaq's first three would be non-existent without Kobe, but it is the same the other way around, and that is not an argument I'm willing to make for Michael. Shaq was clearly the alpha dog on those first three championship teams, and while Kobe was a huge contributor, he was not the main reason the Lakers won those titles, wherein Michael's case he was absolutely the main force behind all of the Bulls' titles. Sure he had help from Pippen, but are you going to tell me without Scottie Jordan would have never won a ring?

    Kobe's first three titles do not compare to Jordan's as far as import to the team, and while a comparison between the supporting cast of the two most recent Laker titles and MJ's Bulls, I would still give the edge to Michael. Look at Longley's and Rodman's offensive output in those Finals; it doesn't compare to the output of Gasol alone. Throw in Odom (who was 6th man of the year, and another extremely athletic center in Bynum and I would argue that Kobe had more than his fair share of support in each of his Finals victories

    ReplyDelete
  4. Also, if you are going to quantify the fact that Shaq SHOULD have won the Finals MVP awards based on the opposition's primary defender on him, then you must not forget that Kobe had to overcome the defense of Eric Snow, Kerry Kittles, and Courtney Lee to put up the statistics he averaged in the Finals; not quite the NBA's All-Defensive Team.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I see your Kerry kitties, Eric snow, and Courtney lee and raise you Danny Ainge, Hershey Hawkins, and Jeff Hornacek.

    Side note: Kobe's guarding the other teams best guard/wing, Michael's splitting that time with Scottie.

    No argument MJ is better, but give Kobe some more respect.

    ReplyDelete
  6. While Michael had Scottie, Kobe had the presence of an elite post player on each of his championship teams, which makes an enormous impact on the defensive end as well. The safety of a solid big body beneath the rim to protect the basket is a perimeter defender's best friend. This is why the DPOY is so often a big guy. A good defensive center can completely anchor a team defensively and make things much easier on all the perimeter defenders. Again, Michael never benefitted from this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not to take anything away from Kobe, however. 9X All-Defensive First Team speaks for itself.

    ReplyDelete